On 30/08/2015 19:16, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > This is strange, I do not think that could be a right explanation of this > issue. The taskqueue callout is initialized with the mutex, which means > that the callout_stop() caller > - must own the mutex; > - is synchronous with the callout. > In other words, callout cannot be running when taskqueue_cancel_timeout() > calls callout_stop(), it only can be dequeued but the callout function > is not yet called. If callout_stop() is performed meantime, between > dropping callout_cpu lock, and locking the mutex, it must be not run. Thank you for the explanation. I am not familiar with the code and I misinterpreted the manual page and thought that callout_stop() might be unable to stop the callout even if it was initialized with the mutex. I see my mistake now. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Sun Aug 30 2015 - 17:10:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:59 UTC