Re: EFI and i915kms questions

From: Joe Maloney <jmaloney_at_pcbsd.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:33:21 -0600
FYI it’s changed a bit more, and line 372 is now line 364 with different options.  Going to try this first which was now at line 364.

https://github.com/pkgdemon/freebsd/commit/f72323b10a9dd6da79f0dae1a6fd68823ec66f7d

Joe Maloney

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Joe Maloney <jmaloney_at_pcbsd.org> wrote:
> 
> Will give this a try, build an image and report back for sure.  Thanks!
> 
> Joe Maloney
> 
>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 1:39 AM, Jean-Sébastien Pédron <jean-sebastien.pedron_at_dumbbell.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> On 02/12/2015 02:00, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> Note that at the top of the function it invokes IICBUS_TRANSFER on a different
>>> device when force_bit_dev is true:
>>> 
>>> 370 	  	  	        sx_xlock(&dev_priv->gmbus_sx);
>>> 371 	  	  	        if (sc->force_bit_dev) {
>>> 372 	dumbbell 	282199 	                error = -IICBUS_TRANSFER(dev_priv->bbbus[unit], msgs, nmsgs);
>>> 373 	kib 	235783 	                goto out;
>>> 374 	  	  	        }
>>> 
>>> Hmm, I would try changing the line at 470 to match the line at 372.
>>> 
>>> They used to match, and then this change:
>> 
>> You're right. This is something I fixed in my i915 update branch but
>> forgot to commit to HEAD...
>> 
>> Joe, could you please try what John suggests to confirm?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jean-Sébastien Pédron
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Thu Dec 03 2015 - 17:33:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC