seems to be solved in r291907: WAS: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431

From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas_at_bris.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:58:51 -0800 (PST)
>From mexas Sun Dec  6 14:44:25 2015
>To: adrian_at_freebsd.org, freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org,
>    freebsd-stable_at_freebsd.org, hps_at_selasky.org, mexas_at_bris.ac.uk
>Subject: Re: urtwn regression(?) from 10.2 to current r291431
>Reply-To: mexas_at_bris.ac.uk
>In-Reply-To: <5664472E.3090601_at_selasky.org>
>
>>From hps_at_selasky.org Sun Dec  6 14:41:27 2015
>>
>>On 12/06/15 15:14, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>>> I posted this about a week ago:
>>>
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-November/058683.html
>>>
>>> The problem is that urtwn stopped
>>> working in current r291431.
>>>
>>> I did more testing with the same revision,
>>> and sometimes it would work, but extremely
>>> slowly, and sometimes seemingly associate
>>> but get an address of 0.0.0.0.
>>>
>>> I now installed 10.2-RELEASE-p8 and
>>> the urtwn works fine, no issues at all.
>>>
>>> Does this look like a bug at some recent
>>> current revision? Should I file a PR?
>>>
>>> I's just I recall there have been major
>>> chages to wlan, so perphaps I'm forgetting
>>> to change the config in recent current?
>>>
>>> Please advise
>>>
>>> Anton
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>There is work ongoing in the WLAN drivers. Did you try the latest -current?
>>
>>--HPS
>
>r291431 was about a week ago.
>Will try latest -current later today.

Seems to be solved in r291907.
Can anybody reproduce this?

Anton
Received on Sun Dec 06 2015 - 21:58:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC