> On 2015-Dec-7, at 12:48 PM, Simon J. Gerraty <sjg_at_juniper.net> wrote: > > Mark Millard <markmi_at_dsl-only.net> wrote: >> My guess is that it is picking up the >> >> MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/xtoolchain > > You should use ?= if you want this to work. > There are many places in Makefile.inc1 where MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is tweaked > in the environment of a sub-make. > > By using = above, you break that. That presumes that MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX has not been assigned a default value before the SRC_ENV_CONF file has been included the first time. If MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX had been defined already then the ?= would do nothing and the wrong value would be used. I believe that the following trace shows that such an assignment of a default value does happen first, making ?= not work either. /usr/src/Makefile (head/Makefile 29160) has > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX?= /usr/obj at line 145 (used when it is not using targets/Makefile from the relevant .if/.else/.endif). Line 105 has .include <bsd.compiler.mk> and there no others before the above assignment. bsd.compiler.mk in turn includes bsd.opt.mk (only), which in turns includes bsd.mkopt.mk (only). That in turn includes nothing else. So these files and only these files are the involved files before that assignment as far as I can tell. None of these get to src.sys.env.mk and so SRC_ENV_CONF use has not happened yet when > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX?= /usr/obj is executed. So, if I understand right, MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX is already defined before the code > SRC_ENV_CONF?= /etc/src-env.conf > .if !empty(SRC_ENV_CONF) && !target(_src_env_conf_included_) > .-include "${SRC_ENV_CONF}" > _src_env_conf_included_: .NOTMAIN > .endif is executed and so using ?= would not be effective in the included file. Did I miss something? === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.netReceived on Mon Dec 07 2015 - 20:33:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC