Carsten Kunze <carsten.kunze_at_arcor.de> wrote: > current groff doesn't build on FreeBSD. I had noticed the same issue > some months ago on NetBSD and cross checked on FreeBSD and it had > worked on FreeBSD. There must have somethig changed since then. How > to reproduce: FreeBSD now uses same make as NetBSD ;-) > When there is a file "test.1.man" and a makefile: > > .SUFFIXES: > .SUFFIXES: .roff .in .ps .mom .pdf .me .ms .ps .html .txt .texi .dvi .pdf .xhtml .man .c .cpp .log .o .obj .sed .sin .test .test$(EXEEXT) .trs .ypp What is the value of EXEEXT at this point? > .man: > _at_echo Making $_at_ from $< > rm -f $_at_ > _at_LC_ALL=C \ > sed -e "s|foo|bar|g" \ > $< >$_at_ > > "make test.1" results in "make: don't know how to make test.1. Stop". > > When ".man" is put to the start of the list it works. It also works > when the first .SUFFIXES line is removed. > > The answer from NetBSD is that this is very likely a bug in make. May > this also be the case for FreeBSD? Since the make is the same, the answer would be yes. But it may not be a bug in make itself: $ echo hi > test.1.man $ make -r -f /homes/sjg/make-tests/suffix2 test.1 Making test.1 from test.1.man $ make -f /homes/sjg/make-tests/suffix2 test.1 make: don't know how to make test.1. Stop make: stopped in /tmp $ Will look deeper...Received on Tue Dec 15 2015 - 16:44:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC