> On Dec 29, 2015, at 06:16, Jeffrey Bouquet <jbtakk_at_iherebuywisely.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:39:59 -0800 (PST), Roger Marquis <marquis_at_roble.com> wrote: … > ...................................................................................................................................... > Not to divert the question and answer, but I recently posted and would like to restate that > it would be useful for a wrapper for installworld after buildworld so that each command in > installworld can complete successfully since the buildworld did.... if that would > be easy to do, BEFORE the actual installworld begins... [not to mention its inclusion at > the bottom of UPDATING in one or more of the methodologies ... eventually... ] > > I've been tripped up many times lately, sometimes in a all-day-rollback fashion, by > the installworld not completing where the buildworld did. > > Seems it would be useful for production machines also... This is one of the areas where snapshotting with filesystems would definitely come in handy, e.g. ZFS (snapshot before installworld, rollback if installworld fails). Cheers, -NGieReceived on Tue Dec 29 2015 - 18:33:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC