01.02.2015 12:12, Lars Engels пишет: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lars Engels wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:35:15AM -0600, Andrew Wilcox wrote: >>> Lars Engels sent: 01 February 2015 03:18: >>>> With acpi_video I get some interesting sysctl: >>>> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.levels: 100 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >>>> 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >>>> 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 >>>> 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >>>> 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 >>>> >>>> I guess it should not be 100 100 0 ... 100? >>> Actually, the "standard" internal ACPI brightness level struct (BRTN in the DSDT) is laid out as: >>> >>> * "Full power" value (one byte, the value at which the brightness should be set on AC by default) >>> * "Economy" value (one byte, the value at which the brightness should be set on battery by default) >>> * Actual values (N bytes, up to Max but frequently not) >>> >>> So, no, that value indeed sounds correct. On my laptop the value is: >>> 80 47 0 7 13 20 27 33 40 47 53 60 67 73 80 87 93 100 >> Thank you for the explanation. >> FWIW, here is the full output from sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0: >> >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 11 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.fullpower: 100 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.economy: 100 >> hw.acpi.video.lcd0.levels: 100 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >> 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 >> 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 >> 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 >> 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 >> hw.acpi.video.crt0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext0.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext1.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext2.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext3.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext4.active: 1 >> hw.acpi.video.ext5.active: 1 >> >>> What revision of -CURRENT are you running? What is the outcome of >>> trying the patch posted Saturday morning (UTC) from Elizabeth Myers >>> (message ID <54CC5311.9070604_at_interlinked.me>)? >>> >> I'm currently running r277858 and haven't tried the patch, yet. But will >> do now and report back. >> > So now I have a new sysctl hw.dri.0.i915_backlight. But no matter what > value I pass to it, the brightness doesn't change. > > It's a Ivy Brigde notebook where drm shows some errors in dmesg. Please > see: http://pastie.org/9877917 > > Please try to boot with acpi_ibm and without acpi_video. This way all works for me.Received on Sun Feb 01 2015 - 09:20:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:55 UTC