Can someone just go digging through the include files to see what the difference in bits are? This may be related to increased power usage that's been reported. -a On 6 February 2015 at 13:06, Allan Jude <allanjude_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2015-02-06 12:10, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Thinkpad T430s: >> >> 11.0-CURRENT #15 r278283: Thu Feb 5 22:45:26 UTC 2015 >> >> Anybody know what this means ? >> >> Feb 6 17:05:58 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:06:12 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:06:18 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:06:27 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:06:38 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:07:15 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 00070000, was 19070000 >> Feb 6 17:07:37 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 00000000 >> Feb 6 17:07:50 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:07:58 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> Feb 6 17:08:12 critter kernel: error: [drm:pid1090:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 19070000, was 19000000 >> >> > > I am pretty sure this is specific to the new drm code > > I saw similar messages when testing the drm patch before it was committed > > -- > Allan Jude >Received on Fri Feb 06 2015 - 21:00:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:55 UTC