Re: nagios vs w/uptime

From: Michael Gmelin <grembo_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:59 +0100
> On 10 Feb 2015, at 22:17, Michael Gmelin <grembo_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 10 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel_at_xcllnt.net> wrote:
>> 
>> [Moving to current_at_]
>> 
>>> On Feb 10, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Peter Wemm <peter_at_wemm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Surprises:
>>> * nagios doesn't like w / uptime anymore. libxo perhaps?
>> 
>> Seems most likely, although I haven’t seen any differences in output
>> in my (admittedly limited) testing.
>> 
>> In what way does Nagios not like w/uptime?
>> Any concrete errors, output or misbehavior?
>> Ideally: can you reproduce the problem?
> 
> 
> Just compared 10.1 to current, unmodified output looks the same, but pipelines don't work properly:
> 
> 10.1:
> # uptime | wc
> 1 12 68
> 
> Current:
> # uptime | wc
> 0 0 0
> 
> # uptime | cat
> # uptime
> 10:16PM  up 9 mins...
> 

Adding xo_finish() to w.c line 268 just right before exit(0); fixes that issue (I don't know libxo well enough to say if this is the proper fix or just a workaround, but it seems logical to me).


> 
> 
>> --
>> Marcel Moolenaar
>> marcel_at_xcllnt.net
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
Received on Tue Feb 10 2015 - 20:25:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:55 UTC