On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:47:27PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha= > > > > t I > > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old = > > > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > make > > > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > > > > > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Bapt > > > > > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to > > > remove old make without notice ? > > > > > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and that > > is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11) > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it? That's what I vaguely remember > as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake > source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but > available as a port. > Yes it is in port for sure. Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:55 UTC