Re: asr(4) error with new clang/llvm

From: Ed Maste <emaste_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 09:41:13 -0500
On 2 January 2015 at 04:07, David Chisnall <theraven_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> The correct solution is to declare the array to have 0 elements (although this will break C++ code).  A zero-length array at the end of a structure is specifically defined by the C standard (since C99) to be a variable-length array.  A length-one array was used in C89 prior to this for this purpose.  Using a 1-element array in C is undefined behaviour.
>
> Note that this change will also require fixing code that allocates it to allocate space for n elements not n-1.

I was thinking of making that change, but the driver was not
particularly straightforward. In addition to your point about
allocation I noticed that it used sizeof() the union containing these
variable-length-array structs. I wouldn't want to try to fix it
without hardware to test.
Received on Fri Jan 02 2015 - 13:42:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC