Hans, We've had 50 machines running 10.1-STABLE with this patch for the better part of a week without issue. Prior we would have seen a panic every few days at the least, so things are looking very promising on our front. Jason On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps_at_selasky.org> wrote: > On 01/07/15 00:10, Jason Wolfe wrote: >> >> >> Hans, >> >> We've been running into 'spin lock held too long' panics in the kernel >> idle threads on 10-STABLE over the past 6 months, so I was interested >> to see your work here in the callout code. I went ahead and brought >> this patch back to a recent 10.1-STABLE base without much issue, >> kern_timeout.c was actually the only piece with some easily resolvable >> rejections. >> >> I've had a box running stable under load with this patch for a few >> days, and 10 more have just been added to the rotation. Anyway just >> figured you might be interested in the some feedback while the changes >> are reviewed. >> > > Hi, > > Thank your for testing this patch. Any updates? > > --HPS >Received on Sun Jan 11 2015 - 17:08:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:54 UTC