On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:58:08AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:47:06PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > > > cpuid = 3; apic id = 13 > > > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8079abf9 > > > stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe047325e360 > > > frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe047325e440 > > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > > current process = 41779 (z) > > > trap number = 9 > > > panic: general protection fault > > > cpuid = 3 > > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfffffe047325e020 > > > panic() at panic+0x1c1/frame 0xfffffe047325e0e0 > > > trap_fatal() at trap_fatal+0x396/frame 0xfffffe047325e140 > > > trap() at trap+0x6ce/frame 0xfffffe047325e2a0 > > > calltrap() at calltrap+0x8/frame 0xfffffe047325e2a0 > > > --- trap 0x9, rip = 0xffffffff8079abf9, rsp = 0xfffffe047325e360, rbp = 0xfffffe047325e440 --- > > > pmap_remove_pages() at pmap_remove_pages+0x539/frame 0xfffffe047325e440 > > > exec_new_vmspace() at exec_new_vmspace+0x180/frame 0xfffffe047325e4a0 > > > exec_elf64_imgact() at exec_elf64_imgact+0x6c0/frame 0xfffffe047325e570 > > > kern_execve() at kern_execve+0x484/frame 0xfffffe047325e8c0 > > > sys_execve() at sys_execve+0x35/frame 0xfffffe047325e920 > > > amd64_syscall() at amd64_syscall+0x289/frame 0xfffffe047325ea30 > > > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xfb/frame 0xfffffe047325ea30 > > > --- syscall (59, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_execve), rip = 0x4251ba, rsp = 0x7ffffe8ebab8, rbp = 0x7ffffe8ec1c0 --- > > > Uptime: 22d22h22m46s > > > > > > #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 > > > 219 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. > > > in pcpu.h > > > (kgdb) #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:219 > > > #1 0xffffffff80555bd7 in kern_reboot (howto=260) > > > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:447 > > > #2 0xffffffff80556040 in panic (fmt=<value optimized out>) > > > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:746 > > > #3 0xffffffff807a2986 in trap_fatal (frame=<value optimized out>, > > > eva=<value optimized out>) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:867 > > > #4 0xffffffff807a25de in trap (frame=<value optimized out>) > > > at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:201 > > > #5 0xffffffff80787ca3 in calltrap () > > > at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:235 > > > #6 0xffffffff8079abf9 in pmap_remove_pages (pmap=0xfffff801c627dec8) > > > at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/pmap.c:5389 > > Please do 'frame 6' and from there, do 'p *m'. Is it reproducable ? > > > > (kgdb) p *m > $9 = {plinks = {q = {tqe_next = 0xfffff804384044c0, > tqe_prev = 0xfffff8042e89eac0}, s = {ss = { > sle_next = 0xfffff804384044c0}, pv = 0xfffff8042e89eac0}, memguard = { > p = 18446735295740134592, v = 18446735295577189056}}, listq = { > tqe_next = 0xfffff8043cddb158, tqe_prev = 0xfffff804335c2358}, > object = 0xfffff801882d5100, pindex = 30, phys_addr = 4352778240, md = { > pv_list = {tqh_first = 0xfffff800bc1d37a8, tqh_last = 0xfefff800bc1d37b0}, The tqh_last has single-bit error, note the 0xf_e_fff8... pattern of the pv_list.tqh_last value. It is consistent with the general protection fault which was reported, amd64 reacts this way to the non-canonical address. It is theoretically possible that some random memory corruption occured, but I tend to believe that hardware bit-flipping took place. > pv_gen = 1012, pat_mode = 6}, wire_count = 0, busy_lock = 1, > hold_count = 0, flags = 0, aflags = 1 '\001', oflags = 0 '\0', > queue = 1 '\001', psind = 0 '\0', segind = 7 '\a', order = 13 '\r', > pool = 0 '\0', act_count = 5 '\005', valid = 255 '?', dirty = 255 '?'} > > It would have been reproducible except that the panic truncated > the program 'z' (which caused the panic) to 0 bytes and took the > source code I was writing. Neither 'z' nor the source code appeared > in /usr/lost+found. Unfortunately, the source code was a quickly > written Fortran program with obviously a programming error, and I > doubt that I'll be able to replicate the program. > > -- > SteveReceived on Sat Jan 24 2015 - 12:20:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:55 UTC