On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 06:28:49PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Do you mean, you want some KPI like > > boolean taskqueue_is_draining(struct taskqueue *p); > > so that e.g. executed task could see if it is executing in the > > shutdown state ? > > > I'd prefer a KPI that stops a taskqueue from accepting new tasks (and drops > attempts to enqueue on the floor). Then I could do something like: > > taskqueue_stop() > disable_interrupts() > taskqueue_drain_all() > taskqueue_free() Having taskqueue_enqueue() which could silently (?) not enqueue the given task is huge and IMO risky change to the KPI. If doing it, I think that there should be a new function to enqueue, which is allowed to fail, unlike taskqueue_enqueue(). BTW, the man page for taskqueue(9) is wrong, taskqueue_enqueue(9) always succeed now and always returns 0 (ignoring the ushort overflow).Received on Thu Jul 02 2015 - 05:08:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:58 UTC