> On 8 Jul 2015, at 08:11, Garrett Wollman <wollman_at_hergotha.csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Perhaps the test was (erroneously) written to assume that > gettimeofday() was a system call, and could therefore detect invalid > pointers and return [EFAULT]. This has not been the case for some > time. (In HEAD, not since r237434, which is three years ago.) In defence of the test, the man page says it can return EFAULT. (IMO the man page and test should change..) -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8CReceived on Wed Jul 08 2015 - 07:09:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:58 UTC