On 2015-07-13 14:08, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015, Allan Jude wrote: > >> On 2015-07-13 11:19, Warren Block wrote: >>>> >>>> Needing the active flag set is indeed a different problem. I am working >>>> on a patch for bsdinstall that will allow the user to request the >>>> active >>>> bit be set as well. >>> >>> For GPT, that should be the default, because it matches the standard. >>> >>> I would like to see an effort to get Lenovo to fix their broken >>> UEFI/BIOS. Adding non-standard PMBR configurations should be short-term >>> hack. >> >> Lenovo has fixed the issue in newer models, x230, t530, t540 etc work >> fine. >> >> Just the x220, t420, and t520 etc series do not. > > The latest BIOS update for the x220 was less than two months ago, so it > is still supported. That they've fixed the problem in other models > shows they understand the issue. So owners of those models should be > bugging Lenovo, so to speak. > > Long-term, it seems like they as a company would be concerned that > special bug fixes naming their specific models are needed. > > Short-term, we probably can't avoid this. It would be nice to be able > to remove a Lenovo-specific hack from gpart in the future with a commit > that says "Fixed by Lenovo BIOS update #123, no longer needed". I tried the latest bios update for the X220, from 2015-05-27 It does not resolve the issue. Also, it required some hoop jumping, as they only provide a bootable cd (x220s do not have CD drives) and a windows program. However, if others are interested, this handy perl script: http://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~krienke/ftp/noarch/geteltorito/ can be used to extract the el torito image from that .iso to a file, that can then be dd'd to a USB stick and update the bios. -- Allan JudeReceived on Mon Jul 13 2015 - 17:23:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:58 UTC