Re: T40 bootloop on CAM status: Command timeout on both 10.1 and -CURRENT

Currently the cdrom drive and yes it works fine till 10 with the legacy 
ATA stack. Verbose boot doesn't give out any errors or logs beside 
what's shown in the picture I have attached with the first email.

Regards,
Pietro Sammarco
On 30/03/2015 21:38, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is there anything connected to the second channel, if so what.
>
> Was this working in a previous version and if so which one and what 
> was the verbose boot log from it?
>
> On 30/03/2015 19:07, bsdml wrote:
>> Hello Kevin,
>>
>> thanks for your clarification. Unfortunately I wasn't aware that the 
>> T40 and *4's line used a SATA-PATA convertor and especially that was 
>> going to clash with the new ATA stack in FreeBSD. Either OpenBSD and 
>> NetBSD do work out of the box without any hassle, however I'd still 
>> prefer to use FreeBSD on it as I have been using FreeBSD for about 8 
>> years now and I am very comfortable with it.
>>
>> The question at this point is, is there any hope to see this issue 
>> resolved in the future? Or will I have to give up to the second ATA 
>> channel in order to use FreeBSD?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pietro Sammarco
>>
>> On 30/03/2015 06:17, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Wolfgang Zenker 
>>> <wolfgang_at_lyxys.ka.sub.org <mailto:wolfgang_at_lyxys.ka.sub.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi,
>>>
>>>     * bsdml <pietro.bsdml_at_gmail.com <mailto:pietro.bsdml_at_gmail.com>>
>>>     [150329 01:34]:
>>>     > since I tried to install FreeBSD 10.1 on my recently purchased 
>>> T40 I got
>>>     > stuck at this annoying bootloop that says
>>>     > "ATAPY_IDENTIFY. ACB: a1 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 etc etc.. CAM
>>>     status:
>>>     > Command timeout". I have also tried latest 11-CURRENT snapshot
>>>     and it
>>>     > did not make any difference at all, it is affected from the same
>>>     exact
>>>     > bootloop.
>>>     > [..]
>>>     > It seems like there might be an issue with the CAM ATA stack 
>>> that is
>>>     > clashing with the PATA controller on my T40.
>>>
>>>     I had the same problem on an ancient T42p. In my case, disabling 
>>> the
>>>     second ata channel allowed me to boot.
>>>
>>>     I added the following line to /boot/device.hints:
>>>     hint.ata.1.disabled="1"
>>>
>>>
>>> This is an annoying side-effect of the brain-dead SATA-PATA 
>>> converter in that generation of ThinkPads. The Intel ICH6 chipset is 
>>> SATA, but, for reasons known ot IBM/Lenovo, the systems used PATA 
>>> drives! So they has a SATA-PATA converter built in that screwed up a 
>>> LOT of things, mostly compromising performance and generating 
>>> assorted log entries. Looks like that also is broken in modern ATA 
>>> support if a drive is not present.
>>>
>>> This was always my biggest complaint with this laptop (T42) which I 
>>> used for several years until I retired and returned to so it could 
>>> be excessed legally as it was government property (and, I didn't 
>>> really want it, even if I could have kept it). Not an awful system, 
>>> but this one issue was really annoying to me.
>>> -- 
>>> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
>>> E-mail: rkoberman_at_gmail.com <mailto:rkoberman_at_gmail.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"