Re: What to do about RCS/OpenRCS

 On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:18:38PM -0700, NGie Cooper wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > On 05/07/15 14:56, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >>
> >>> Unfortunately I don't use RCS enough (it looks like I should though)
so
> >>> I am not in a good position to take the next step and deal with any
> >>> fallout it may produce.
> >>
> >>
> >> If we can have a build-knob to disable GNU RCS and enable the new one
I
> >> will happily twist up the new version and hammer on it.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, that's usually the next step in the process. It is a little bit
messy
> > because
> > there is a WITHOUT_RCS option and openrcs doesn't have rcsfreeze (and
> > perhaps something else that we don't use).
> >
> > I really want to check out first if there is some strong opinion
against
> > OpenRCS. Perhaps someone that has used it before and thinks it is a
> > bad idea.
> >
> > It looks like there are voices against it, so those have to be
addressed
> > first.
>
> Setting WITHOUT_RCS also breaks etcupdate (the tool requires rcs
> bits); check with jhb first to make sure that OpenRCS works with
> etcupdate.

Confirmed.  Pedro, are you also willing to fix fallout as Xin Li pointed
out?
If not, please revert, thanks.