On 08/11/2015 21:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > Here's the same commit, and the difference between 1.8 and 1.9: > > % git cat-file commit 803795d > tree 7fc83aba022834da5c218114b09ad4640735bcc0 > parent c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5 > author olgeni <olgeni_at_FreeBSD.org> 1437203525 +0000 > committer olgeni <olgeni_at_FreeBSD.org> 1437203525 +0000 > > Upgrade to version 0.4.1. > % git cat-file commit 61ca43b > tree 7fc83aba022834da5c218114b09ad4640735bcc0 > parent c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5 > author olgeni <olgeni_at_FreeBSD.org> 1437203529 +0000 > committer olgeni <olgeni_at_FreeBSD.org> 1437203529 +0000 > > Upgrade to version 0.4.1. > > > In case you don't see it, there's a 4s difference in the timestamps > for authoring and committing. Here's the original: > > % svn log -vc392405 svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r392405 | olgeni | 2015-07-18 09:12:05 +0200 (Sat, 18 Jul 2015) | 2 lines > Changed paths: > M /head/www/elixir-maru/Makefile > M /head/www/elixir-maru/distinfo > > Upgrade to version 0.4.1. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > So yeah, svn 1.9 returned a timestamp that was off by 4s. WTF? > 4 seconds?? There have been 4 leap seconds added this century. Did 1.9 add timestamp corrections relating to leap seconds? Did the developer not use leapsecs when the svn server does? -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane AmblerReceived on Mon Nov 09 2015 - 03:51:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC