On 11/10/15 9:52 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > My vote is to remove the HPN patches. First, the NONE cipher made more > sense back when we didn't have AES-NI widely available, and you were > seriously limited by it's performance. Now we have both aes-gcm and > chacha-poly which it's performance should be more than acceptable for > today's uses (i.e. cipher performance is 2GB/sec+). AES-NI doesn't help the absurdity of double-encrypting when using scp or rsync/ssh over an encrypted VPN, which is where NONE makes sense to use for me. -- Regards, Bryan DreweryReceived on Tue Nov 10 2015 - 23:32:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC