On 11/11/15 4:05 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:58:35PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >>> Some for as ports version? >>> Or ports version different? >>> Or port mantainer have more time (this is not to blame for DES)? >>> I am just don't know what is different between port ssh and base ssh. >>> We need ssh 6.x in base, not 7.x as in port (why?) and this is need >>> independed work on pathes? >>> I am missing somehow commonplace for others. >>> >> >> I am the ports maintainer. That was my opinion on why OpenSSH falls >> behind. There is no real difference between the base and port version >> except that the port version has some more optional patches, and is >> easier to push updates for through ports and packages, rather than an >> Errata through freebsd-update or a full release to get to the latest >> OpenSSH version. > > This impact only to deploy, not to patch, right? It's harder to maintain the port version due to how the patches are applied and generated. That's only my problem though. > Or bugs found around NPH/NONE patches? > >> There have been many times where the base version was more up-to-date >> than the port as well due to the lack of a maintainer or the previously >> mentioned patch blockers. -- Regards, Bryan DreweryReceived on Wed Nov 11 2015 - 23:10:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC