> On Nov 14, 2015, at 19:46, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Nov 14, 2015, at 19:28, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya_at_gmail.com> wrote: > > … > >> Why were these locales removed? >> >> 58 OLD_FILES+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-1/LC_COLLATE >> 59 OLD_FILES+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-1/LC_CTYPE >> 60 OLD_FILES+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-1/LC_TIME >> 61 OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-1 >> 62 OLD_FILES+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-13/LC_COLLATE >> 63 OLD_FILES+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-13/LC_CTYPE >> 64 OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/locale/la_LN.ISO8859-13 > > la_LN.ISO8859-1 is the old Latin locale, which is no longer installed. Copying over locale files from a stable/10 host works, but I’m confused as to why a bunch of locales weren’t ported over in their non-UTF-8 forms. > Thanks, /usr/share/locale/en_US.ISO8859-15/LC_CTYPE is also broken; I opened up the file and it was empty. Thanks, -NGieReceived on Sun Nov 15 2015 - 03:17:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC