Re: Wake on LAN broken (probably between r290542 - r290606)?

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 09:56:36AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:33:37AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > But a quick perusal of
> > <https://docs.freebsd.org/mail/current/svn-src-head.html> doesn't show
> > anything especially like a "smoking gun" -- to me, anyway.
> > 
> > Can anyone else confirm or refute my observations?  Or suggest a
> > hint?  I'll try narrowing it down myself, but I need to do it during
> > times I'm at home (so I can manually power the machine back up when
> > it fails to respond to WoL), so it may be a few days before I can
> > accomplish much that way.
> > ....
> 
> r290565 still works; r290566 fails -- in my case.  r290566 changed some
> re(4) behavior, and the NIC on my affected machine is an re(4):
> 
> re0_at_pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x05b71028 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x0c
> hdr=0x00
>     vendor     = 'Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'
>     device     = 'RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet
> Controller'
>     class      = network
>     subclass   = ethernet
> 
> from "pciconf -lv" while running:
> 
> D freebeast.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1904  r290565M/290565:1100089: Sat Nov 14 09:44:33 PST 2015     root_at_freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  amd64
> 
> I've placed a copy of a verbose dmes.boot in
> <http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/freebeast/>.
> 
> I'm happy to test suggested changes.
> 

*sigh* Okay, could you please test whether the attached patch restores
WOL capability for you?

Marius