Am Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:59 +0200 Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> schrieb: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 03:11:42PM -0500, Henry Hu wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:07 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On most recent CURRENT (Revision: 291458), ob booting I receive this on > > > the console: > > > > > > Shared object "libelf.so.2" not found, required by "libkvm.so.6" > > > > > > What looking at the shared object cache with ldconfig -r, I find > > > libelf.so.2 as well as > > > libkvm.so.6 listed. > > > > > > What is this weird message? > > > > > > > > locate libelf.so.2 > > ... > > /usr/lib/libelf.so.2 > > ... > > > locate libkvm.so.6 > > /lib/libkvm.so.6 > > ... > > > ldd /lib/libkvm.so.6 > > /lib/libkvm.so.6: > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800822000) > > > > It's strange that your libkvm.so.6 depends on libelf.so.2. Where does it > > come from? > > Does the original reporter have root and /usr volumes split ? > Show the 'mount' output on the affected machine. Yes, I have split them, of course. / is a partition, /usr is also a partition, also /var and /usr/local. In fstab, / is the first, /usr the second getting mounted. Kind regards, oh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:01 UTC