-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/02/15 00:47, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:39:11 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10_at_gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Oliver, >> >> did you try Sean's suggestion? >> >> - Eric >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:10 PM Sean Bruno <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> >> wrote: >> > > > On 09/21/15 23:23, O. Hartmann wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:13:18 +0000 Eric Joyner >>>>> <ricera10_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you do a diff between r288057 and r287761, there are >>>>>> no differences between the sys/dev/e1000, sys/modules/em, >>>>>> and sys/modules/igb directories. Are you sure r287761 >>>>>> actually works? >>>>> >>>>> I'm quite sure r287761 works (and r287762 doesn't), double >>>>> checked this this morning again. I also checked r288093 and >>>>> it is still not working. >>>>> >>>>> The ensure that I'm not the culprit and stupid here: >>>>> >>>>> I use a NanoBSD environment and the only thing that gets >>>>> exchanged, is the underlying OS/OS revision. The >>>>> configuration always stays the same. The base system for >>>>> all of my tests is built from a clean source - (deleted >>>>> obj/ dir, clean, fresh build into obj/ for every test I >>>>> ran). >>>>> >>>>> I realised a funny thing. Playing around with >>>>> enabling/disabling TSO (I have been told that could be the >>>>> culprit in an earlier Email from this list) with the >>>>> commend sequence: >>>>> >>>>> ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 -tso ifconfig igb1 up >>>>> ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 tso ifconfig igb1 up . . >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> while a ping is pinging in the background a remote host >>>>> connected to that specific interface, the ping does work >>>>> for a while and dies then after a round trip of roughly 10 >>>>> - 20. I can reproduce this. >>>>> >>>>> is that observation of any help? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> oh >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:58 AM O. Hartmann >>>>>> <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:23:44 -0700 Sean Bruno >>>>>>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote: >>>>>>>>>> He has an i210 -- he would want to revert >>>>>>>>>> e1000_i210.[ch], too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it >>>>>>>>>> would be a good idea for you should revert this >>>>>>>>>> patch, and Jeff and I can go look at trying these >>>>>>>>>> shared code updates and igb changes internally >>>>>>>>>> again. We at Intel really could've done a better >>>>>>>>>> job of making sure these changes worked across a >>>>>>>>>> wider variety of devices. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Eric >>>>> >>>>> I've reverted the changes to head. I'll reopen the reviews >>>>> and we can proceed from there. >>>>> >>>>> sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno >>>>>>>>>> <sbruno_at_freebsd.org <mailto:sbruno_at_freebsd.org>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> r287762 broke the system >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Before I revert this changeset *again* can you >>>>>>>>>> test revert r287762 from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c >>>>>>>>>> and e1000_82575.h *only* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That narrows down the change quite a bit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> sean >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> mailing >>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>>>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org>" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm now on r288057 on that specific machine, supposedly >>>>>>> reverted changes that seemingly has been identified as >>>>>>> the culprit. Still NO change in behaviour! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> r287761 works with the same configuration on igb >>>>>>> (i210), any further does not. Not ping/connect from the >>>>>>> outside, no ping/connect from the inside. Tried >>>>>>> different protocols (SAMBA, ssh, LDAP, DNS). Affected >>>>>>> is/are only boxes with the igb driver and i210 chipset >>>>>>> (we do not have other chips covered by igb). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, Oliver >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >>>>> >>>>> > > > For my entertainment (and HPS's), can you run HEAD and revert > r287775? > > sean >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To >>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > I did as suggested: > > checking out the most recent HEAD of CURRENT this morning, which > is/was for me r288474. I applied then "svn merge -c -287775 .", > which reverted(?) only r287775, which is something with > tcp_output.c or so. I did not remember. > Thanks. This is what I intended. > I recompiled a fresh world (cleaning up /usr/obj completely by > deleting the folder) and try running the target system with the > created image. > > Result: the same as >r287761, it doesn't work. I reverted back to > r287761, which works for me on the specific target hardware > (Fujitsu Primergy RX 1330 M1). > What's really confusing me is that I've reverted r287762 and you are still having problems. Can you set bootverbose (boot_verbose="YES" in loader.conf) with the current version of -CURRENT and post the dmesg somewhere for me to look at? sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWDqhWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kxMAH/i1I5T7RERbF7yF7OBI2eoBq fOytD8/KJSlNEe3bOOsF2ZFXtFzhwoJAjY3ykXPpc9yyWh4cqxAi6OuAkFR/fmtU BC/tbo6eiuRA9lYUa1TpjwI72ru8xG2uYVVlc5lm5Z9ndDmo+eRwM5TPnjJHNCGz x9VXqv4rTi0kWIcPA67lKxnMFSStsMPwr9yIj87pyGoIVGWYb3VSnMNDbNDrYeUI X3z+WaQjstyxZpIUNl8iqR3zloNyCO9unrT9m6ZrWWUDC3V2Fqud5mdia5yADk2F C+ct7nBkd/j9zQY0Qptpn5N3MInhnvZGR+LhTD4KYhgSm4GEfHJc7h6Hl4aeEvM= =NtTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Fri Oct 02 2015 - 13:53:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC