(CCing Gerald as this may involve a g++ bug as well.) Hello; On 12/10/2015 03:33 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> Hi again; >> >> On 12/10/2015 03:16 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> Hello; >>> >>> On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: >>>> The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support >>>> -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from >>>> my poudriere run): libfpx and qt4-sqlite3-plugin. >>>> >>>> - Justin >>> >>> r288669 only applies to base. It was tested with an exp-run and there were >>> no >>> failures so this is something wrong in your setup. >>> >> Ugh ... now that I remember, we actually used -stack-protector-all for the >> exp-run >> (which is supported in pretty much every gcc). >> >> Still, the change should only apply to the base system and not ports, and >> -stack-protector-strong appears to have been backported to gcc48 >> last year (see PR 186852). >> >> cheers, >> >> Pedro. >> > All I can say is building with USE_GCC=yes, I see the following error: > > g++48: error: unrecognized command line option '-fstack-protector-strong' > > This is using the latest gcc48 in ports (full tree updated yesterday). Well ... gcc48 carries the stack-protector-strong patches: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/lang/gcc48/files/ I will try to reproduce locally. Pedro.Received on Mon Oct 12 2015 - 18:46:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC