On 10/26/15 19:03, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL >> to only build the modules. >> >> What do you think about the following patch: >> >>> diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk >>> index ddf828e..f0920df 100644 >>> --- a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk >>> +++ b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk >>> _at__at_ -32,7 +32,11 _at__at_ KERN_DEBUGDIR?= ${DEBUGDIR} >>> >>> .for target in all clean cleandepend cleandir clobber depend install \ >>> obj reinstall tags >>> +.if !defined(NO_KERNEL) >>> ${target}: kernel-${target} >>> +.else >>> +${target}: >>> +.endif >>> .if !defined(MODULES_WITH_WORLD) && !defined(NO_MODULES) && exists($S/modules) >>> ${target}: modules-${target} >>> modules-${target}: >> >> It allows only a single module with MODULES_OVERRIDE= and NO_KERNEL=YES >> to be built with universe in very little time. This can save a lot of >> build time when changes are limited to a set of kernel modules. > > Can you just use something like MODULES_WITH_WORLD instead? > > make tinderbox MAKE_JUST_WORLDS=yes SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=sys/modules MODULES_OVERRIDE=foo > > (If it's only 1 module directory you can probably just use SUBDIR_OVERRIDE directly?) > > make tinderbox MAKE_JUST_WORLDS=yes SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=sys/modules/foo > Hi John, The command you suggested will re-build all the cross-tools, which is not what I want. --HPSReceived on Tue Oct 27 2015 - 08:05:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC