On 10/30/15 09:32, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Well, it’s on stable/10 since September 16 and somebody reported that > this particular branch would not trigger the crash along with HEAD, > but any 10.x would. Can’t find the reference right now though. That was me, amongst others. There are threads on security_at_ and questions_at_. >> On 30 Oct 2015, at 10:24 am, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 30, 2015, at 02:18, Franco Fichtner <franco_at_lastsummer.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I did a quick test build and this seems to solve the ntpd crash issue >>> on top of releng/10.1. >> >> Makes sense … looking through my email r287591 was never MFCed back to stable/9 or stable/10 :/ . >> HTH, >> -NGie There were two problems reported: 1) ntpdc and ntpq would crash -- this was reported for 9.3-STABLE -- I don't think it affected other releases, and was diagnosed as due to a pthreads linking issue. Solved for 9.x in r290044 and r290046 2) ntpd SEGV's on startup on 10.2-RELEASE-p6 (possibly others). Curiously, so does net/ntp from ports, but only on the second startup. Exactly the same ntp package seems to run and restart just fine on recent 10-STABLE though. As does the base system ntpd. Cheers, Matthew
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:00 UTC