On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:22:49PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:22:04 +0100 > David Chisnall <theraven_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On 5 Apr 2016, at 10:07, Gergely Czuczy <gergely.czuczy_at_harmless.hu> wrote: > > > > > > Also, quite often entries from the base system are changed > > > manually, think of root's/toor's password. Are such cases > > > going to be dealt with properly between upgrades, including > > > self-built-and-packaged base systems? Currently it can be a > > > PITA with mergemaster to handle things like master.passwd > > > properly between upgrades, automation so far wasn't famous on > > > doing it properly. > > > > Mergemaster uses a 2-way merge. It has the version that you > > have installed and the version that's being proposed for > > installation. Etcupdate and pkg perform a 3-way merge. It has > > the pristine version, the version that you have made changes > > to, and the new version. If you have changed an entry and so > > has the package, then you will get a conflict that you have to > > resolve manually. If you have added lines and so has the > > upstream version, then that should cleanly apply. Similarly, > > if you and upstream have both modified different lines, then > > there should be no problem. > > > > Will there be an option not to merge? I never update /etc when > I do installworld because what I have works for me and I see no > need to make any changes to a working system. Yes pkg has an option to not merge and will give you some .pkgnew files Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC