On 15/04/2016 07:19, Warner Losh wrote: > Samsung 830 all firmware > Samsung 840 all firmware > Samsung 850 all firmware > > All of these are at least 18 months old (if not older). There's some > confusing in Linux lists on > the full impact of the Samsung drives (there was a bug in the Linux > implementation (that can't > be present in the FreeBSD implementation) that may have been the root cause > for the Samsung > black listing). Out of an abundance of caution, I've kept them in the list. For what it's worth, I have been using the following SSDs since September of 2015 : ada2: <Samsung SSD 850 EVO 120GB EMT01B6Q> ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device ada3: <Samsung SSD 850 EVO 120GB EMT01B6Q> ACS-2 ATA SATA 3.x device with ZFS with TRIM enabled and I haven't seen any problems thus far: $ sysctl kstat | fgrep trim kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.failed: 0 kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.unsupported: 2268 kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.success: 36895209 kstat.zfs.misc.zio_trim.bytes: 976003989504 Those disks are partitioned and host a small ZFS root / system pool plus log and cache vdevs for other HDD-based pool. So, I think that if the SSDs had any problem with TRIM I would have noticed it by now. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Fri Apr 15 2016 - 05:49:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC