On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 02:06:43PM +0100, Paul Wootton wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:01PM, Paul Wootton wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02PM, Paul Wootton wrote: > > > >With the help of Konstantin, I have got a proper disassembly. > > > >I have recompiled a few times so my new panic is > >instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80fed2d9 > >stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff824d89c0 > >frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffffff824d8a40 > >code segment = base 0x0, Limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > >Processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0 > >Current process = 0 (swapper) > >[ thread pid 0 tid 100000 ] > >Stopped at native_lapic_setup+0x99: lesl %edx,%esp > > > >and a disassembly gives > >0xffffffff80fed2d9 <native_lapic_setup+153>: (bad) 0x99 == 153 > > > >Now to figure out why I am making bad binaries. > >Ive not seen any issues yet with the world, so its not as if every binary I > >make is bad > > I have found that having CPUTYPE?=native in /etc/make.conf was my issue. > Commenting that line out (the only other line I have is KERNCONF) and now I > can build a good kernel I think there is something to look at by clang people.Received on Fri Apr 15 2016 - 11:20:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC