Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:57:45 +0300
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:41:29AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:39:11AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > We've managed to keep this disease out of BSD since I started to do it in
> > > > 1990. First we laughed/fumed at Sun's Solaris when they unbundled the
> > > > compiler. then we fumed at xorg when hey took a useful package and made 190
> > > > odd packages out of it. Please don't force this on us!
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > What isn't clear about the *numerous* statements that no one is being
> > > *forced* to use packaged base?
> > 
> > Because nowhere present roadmap about co-existing packaged base and
> > traditionsl install.
> > Because nowhere present roadmap of packaged base future.
> > Because package base is show-stoper for 11.0 relese -- this is read as
> > "11.0 switch to package base".
> > 
> 
> And nowhere did it say "buildworld/buildkernel would no longer work."

buildworld/builkernel is requrement for `make packages`.
I am expect of removing installworld/installkernel.
Yes, I am don read about this. But in IT I am need to read between the
lines.
Also, installkernel broken in 10.x for multiple kernels and not planed
to fix. Why I need to expect different to this?
Received on Tue Apr 19 2016 - 06:57:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC