Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

From: dan_partelly <dan_partelly_at_rdsor.ro>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:39:37 +0300
> 
> What should not happen is that this incremental step forward be blocked 
> by those unwilling to hash out the next steps.
> 
> -Alfred
> 
> 

While incremental steps forward are great, how do you avoid situations
like VNET, where a "good enough" enough implementation, usable in some 
scenarios lingered for years in kernel, but to this day it suffers from
leaks and bugs. Once you go down the path of enabling it in this state, 
chances are that it will stay that way for more than half a decade. 
Received on Tue Apr 19 2016 - 12:39:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC