Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

From: Ernie Luzar <luzar722_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 12:06:56 -0400

> As long as packaged base is not mandatory, it is fine by me.
> 

+1  on that

Received on Fri Apr 22 2016 - 14:06:46 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kurt Jaeger: "Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)"
Previous message: Roger Marquis: "Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)"
In reply to: Daniel Kalchev: "Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)"
Next in thread: Roger Marquis: "Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC