Hi, I am trying to rewrite userland programs (especially daemons) to support userland DTrace probes to make it possible to trace the behavior by using dtrace(1). The purpose is to provide a consistent interface to enable/collect debug log and show internal states. A lot of daemons define their own debug output function like dprintf() and there is no consistency of where to be recorded. I would like your comment about this change because I want to know whether this change (or direction) is acceptable or not. I put an example by using syslogd at the following URL: (diff) https://people.freebsd.org/~hrs/syslogd_usdt.20161220-1.diff (tarball) https://people.freebsd.org/~hrs/syslogd_usdt.20161220-1.tar.gz You can try to compile a new syslogd, run it, and then attach dtrace(1) to the syslogd process by "dtrace -q -CI./ -s ./syslogd_trace.d -p `pgrep syslogd`" in the same directory. Basically this change is invisible for normal users. This includes some rough edges but I think it is sufficient to understand the concept. I do not intend to commit this soon. Questions from me are the following: 1. Where should foo_probes.d and foo_trace.d be installed? And if they depend on foo.h, where should foo.h be? 2. Is documenting probes into foo.8 reasonable? The details are as follows. * Rewrite example This rewrite is twofold. First, simply replace a call of the logging function into DTrace USDT like this: (old) | dprintf("an error occurred, errno=%d\n", errno); (new) | FOO_LOG(LOG_ERR, "an error occurred, errno=%d\n", errno); And then if it involves a result of a specific operation, replace trace probes for the simple logging with dedicated ones: (old) | error = bind(s, res->ai_addr, res->ar_addrlen); | if (error) { | dprintf("bind failed, errno=%d\n", errno); | close(s); | return (-1); | } (new) | error = bind(s, res->ai_addr, res->ar_addrlen); | if (error) { | FOO_SOCK_BIND_FAILED(errno, s, res->ai_addr, res->ar_addrlen); | close(s); | return (-1); | } | FOO_SOCK_BIND_SUCCESS(s, res->ai_addr, res->ar_addrlen); and implement the functionality of the original log message in D script: | foo$target:::sock-bind-failed | { | printf("bind failed, errno=%d", arg0); | /* The other argN can be used to report in more detail. */ | } * Additional files in the existing directory layout After this rewrite, the directory layout for a daemon "foo" will look like the following: | Makefile | foo.8 | foo.c | foo.h | foo_probes.d | foo_trace.d foo_probes.d and foo_trace.d are added. The former is the definition of USDT probes, and the latter is a D script example to reproduce the original debug log by dprintf() or something like that. A section to describe what probes are available is added into foo.8. One can trace the foo daemon using "dtrace -Cs foo_trace.d -p `pgrep foo`" on runtime, and also can create own script. foo.h may be added because foo_probes.d and foo_trace.d often require information of data structure used in foo.c. * Possible incompatible change A debug flag to activate additional logging is no longer necessary after this rewrite, so we can remove it (-d flag in the case of syslogd). And dump of the internal state can be implemented as a SIGINFO handler. In the syslogd example, SIGINFO dumps syslogd configuration and access control list. -- Hiroki
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:09 UTC