On 22/02/2016 00:04, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:39:32 -0600 (CST) Dan Mack <mack_at_macktronics.com> wrote > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Joe Holden wrote: >> >>> On 17/02/2016 14:07, Daniel Kalchev wrote: >>>>> On 17.02.2016 ?., at 15:40, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb_at_hardenedbsd.org> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> TL;DR: FreeBSD is not affected by CVE-2015-7547. >>>> >>>> Unless you use Linux applications under emulation. >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>> Which is supported by ports so at most it should be a ports advisory and >>> not a FreeBSD (base) SA and therefore not on the website. >>> >>> Just my 2p ;) >> Documenting and putting out security advisiories for other operating >> systems seems like a bad precedent in general. The same could be said >> for runniing java applications, windows under bhyve, etc. - *sigh* - >> if the cross over use is common via a port, then have the port maybe >> remind users to consult their distribution specific security >> vulnerabilites prior to running it maybe - which is what they should >> be doing anyway. >> >> That's my two insignificant cents :-) >> >> Dan > If Sell distributes a bad batch of gasoline. It's not Chevrolet's > responsibility to inform it's car buyers/owners, that Shell produced > a bad batch of gasoline. Is it? :) > > --Chris Exactly, however it is done now so nevermindReceived on Thu Feb 25 2016 - 11:36:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC