bcc: current_at_ Moving the discussion to transport_at_. On 12/28/15 at 12:25P, Sam Kumar wrote: > Hello, > I am working with the code for the TCP Stack. I noticed that support for > Challenge Acks have been added since the latest release (10.2.0), and I > think I may have found a bug in how they relate to TCP timestamps. All line > numbers below are those in commit e66e064c45687b5d294565dbd829b419848f7992. > > Looking at tcp_input.c, at lines 1594 to 1604, I see code that expects a > timestamp to be in every segment during the session, if they were > negotiated when the connection was being established. > ( > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c#L1595 > ) > > Looking at tcp_input.c, at lines 2161 and 2188, I see that Challenge ACKs > are sent via calls to tcp_respond(). > ( > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c#L2161 > and > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c#L2188 > ) > > Looking at tcp_subr.c, at line 978, I see that the segment sent by > tcp_respond() never contains TCP options. > (https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c#L978) > > Therefore, it seems to me that Challenge ACKs will never contain any TCP > options. This violates the condition that once timestamps are negotiated, > they must be present in every segment. > > Please let me know if I am mistaken, or if this is actually a bug. > > Sam Kumar > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:02 UTC