It shouldn't have changed though; you're just requesting memory to use for x86bios calls. +jhb - any ideas? -a On 8 January 2016 at 20:53, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_komquats.com> wrote: > Cy Schubert writes: >> In message <201601080107.u0817kDw078603_at_slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert >> writes: >> > In message <CAJ-VmonGOs2f+rzciEcV=VuaNrZt0hqNePQx4LZDWu6BxuR9NQ_at_mail.gmail. >> c >> > om> >> > , Adrian Chadd writes: >> > > Ok, >> > > >> > > So try adding this check: >> > > >> > > vmbuf = x86bios_alloc(&offs, sizeof(*buf), M_WAITOK); >> > > if (vmbuf == NULL) { >> > > printf("%s: x86bios_alloc failed!\n", __func__); >> > > goto fail; >> > > } >> > > >> > > ... that call shouldn't be failing, but if it's truely failing on the >> > > bcopy(), the only reason is because vmbuf is NULL. >> > >> > Thanks. I'll try this. >> > >> > vesa.c hasn't changed for a while so I suspect the root cuase may be >> > somewhere else (we're probably treating the symptom here). Nice thing about >> >> > using the same mobo and cpu combination on all my machines (except >> > laptops), failures are completely reproducible. Might be a good idea to put >> >> > in a dtrace probe too. >> >> Hi Adrian, >> >> Your patch fixed the issue. I've included a dtrace probe. I suspect the >> error may be BIOS specific and the dtrace probe should help in tracking it >> down. Does this look good to commit? > > A bit of multitasking going on here. I should have included the patch. :~ > > > > > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_komquats.com> or <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com> > FreeBSD UNIX: <cy_at_FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org > > The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. >Received on Sat Jan 09 2016 - 05:44:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:02 UTC