I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=292782 It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c) with cperciva_at_'s version from libmd. In benchmarks it was 5-30% faster, on x86_64 and arm/mips. But, in head I ended up being asked to bump __FreeBSD_version because it removes sys/crypto/sha2.h which was apparently used by a 3rd party driver, and replaces it with sys/crypto/sha512.h Does this kind of change mean it cannot be MFCd to stable/10? Or is it ok to MFC it? -- Allan Jude
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:02 UTC