Re: FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1340 - Still Failing

From: Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) <"Ngie>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:54:20 -0700
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:52, Dimitry Andric <dim_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> On 05 Jul 2016, at 18:03, jenkins-admin_at_freebsd.org wrote:
>> 
>> FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc - Build #1340 - Still Failing:
>> 
>> Build information: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1340/
>> Full change log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1340/changes
>> Full build log: https://jenkins.FreeBSD.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/1340/console
> ...
>> /builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/usr.sbin/bhyve/rfb.c: In function 'sse42_supported':
>> /builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/usr.sbin/bhyve/rfb.c:885:17: error: 'bit_SSE42' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> return ((ecx & bit_SSE42) != 0);
>>                ^
> 
> So, this is because clang's and gcc's versions of cpuid.h use slightly different naming for these bits:
> 
> clang's cpuid.h:
> 
> #define bit_SSE41       0x00080000
> #define bit_SSE42       0x00100000
> 
> gcc's cpuid.h:
> 
> #define bit_SSE4_1      (1 << 19)
> #define bit_SSE4_2      (1 << 20)
> 
> Unfortunately there are more bit defines that differ.  No standardization on this point, it seems. :-/
> 
> For this specific compile error, we could put in a little crutch like:
> 
> #if defined(bit_SSE4_2) && !defined(bit_SSE42)
> #define bit_SSE42 bit_SSE4_2
> #endif
> 
> Thoughts?

	Seems ok to me. I was going to submit a patch to fix the other issues with bhyve (because I am getting annoyed by the build failure emails).
Thanks,
-Ngie

Received on Tue Jul 05 2016 - 16:54:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:06 UTC