On 12.07.2016 1:44, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 11.07.2016 21:41, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:28:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> >>> On 07/10/16 10:10 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>>> On 10.07.2016 16:30, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>>>> I am surprised lack of support GOST in openssl-base. >>>>> Can be this enabled before 11.0 released? >>>> >>>> AFAIK openssl maintainers says something like they can't support this >>>> code and it will become rotten shortly with new changes, so they drop it. >>> >>> [OpenSSL-maintainer-for-the-base hat on] >>> >>> GOST is supported on FreeBSD 10.x and 11.x. We will not drop it on >>> these branches unless secteam explicitly ask us to do so. However, we >>> *may* drop it from 12.0 *iff* we import OpenSSL 1.1.0 branch. >>> >>> [OpenSSL-maintainer-for-the-base hat off] >>> >>> Jung-uk Kim >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >> May be need file PR for dns/bind910? >> >> # grep -3 BROK /poudriere/ports/default/dns/bind910/Makefile >> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk> >> >> .if ( ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGOST_ASN1} ) && ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base >> BROKEN= OpenSSL from the base system does not support GOST, add \ >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl to your /etc/make.conf and rebuild everything \ >> that needs SSL. >> .endif >> > > I dislike idea to use GOST in the bind, it is unneeded there, DNSSEC > don't use GOST, so I vote for removing GOST option from there. > I need to note that RFC exists, proposing GOST (old version) for DNSSEC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5933 but nobody really use it.Received on Mon Jul 11 2016 - 20:52:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:06 UTC