Hi Glen, nice update, glad being of some help. The slowdown may be related to the fact that geom_uzip reads whole compressed cluster, which is 20-30k typically, even if only single block from that cluster is requested. I imagine it might impact rc.d, which is essentially bunch of small(ish) shell scripts and I would not be surprised if their blocks would be scattered all over the place. There is some very basic caching in the geom_uzip module, but it is only one cluster deep. What might help if you still have some room on the CD is to decrease cluster size (-s parameter of mkuzip), to something like 32k or even 16k. That would make compression less effective, but would reduce the I/O bandwidth waste, which could also be important for the KVM setups. I might also look into making a bigger cache, as RAM is getting cheaper and more abundant every day. Another approach would be to make several "partitions", segregating for example /etc stuff so it's all tighly packed together and you can also use smaller cluster size for /etc and bigger for the rest. In any case, keep me posted with your findings. -Max On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Glen Barber <gjb_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > Just replying to the first email in the thread, since it's a general > reply, and only related to the original topic at hand, and only for > informative purposes at this point. > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:01:51PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > > Just downloaded the amd64 BETA1 ISO (873MB) and tried to burn a CD on > > Windows 10. It complained that the ISO is too big for my 700 MB CD-r. > > > > I have *something* semi-working, with a huge amount of help from Maxim > in private email. There is still a nit or two to fix, I'm running into > them as I rebuild the ISO after fixing the prior issue. But, right now, > I can get the ISO to boot enough to get to a shell (the "init failed due > to inability to mount '/'" shell, but it is still a shell). :) > > Once I get what I have now into a state where it's somewhat committable, > I'm going to create a project branch to sand off the edges, instead of > doing it directly in head, since there might be some edge cases for > non-x86 architectures. (But some other architectures do not have the > "too big" problem.) > > Once that is merged, I fully intend to merge this to stable/11, provided > there is no major fallout. With what I have now, disc1.iso is 630M, and > the disc1.iso.xz is 554M. I'll upload an image somewhere public for > people to test 11.0-BETA1 on hardware, KVM, etc. One thing to note, > though, there appears to be a significantly non-zero speed decrease, > though this may just be because my CD-ROM is USB-based. When I have the > ready-to-commit result, I'll test it on a machine with an internal CD > drive. > > Glen > >Received on Thu Jul 14 2016 - 03:30:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:06 UTC