Re: svn: Skipped '.' Summary of conflicts: Skipped paths: 1

Hi, Reference:
> From:		Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk_at_mit.edu>
> Date:		Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:19:43 -0400 (EDT)

Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> 
> > Hi current_at_
> > I've seen this ### about 3 times lately, anyone else ?
> > 	uname -a
> > 		FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD
> > 		12.0-CURRENT #1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST
> > 		2016
> > 		jhs_at_lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small
> > 		amd64
> >
> > 	svn co -q file:///usr/svn/base/head
> > 	svn up
> > 	###	Skipped '.'
> > 	###	Summary of conflicts:
> > 	###	  Skipped paths: 1
> 
> Does 'svn st' have anything interesting to say?
> -Ben

cd /usr/src
svn st
	svn: warning: W155007: '/data/release/12.0-CURRENT/usr/src' is not a working copy
I had removed content ready for a rebuild
ls -la
	total 12
	drwxr-xr-x   3 jhs   staff   512 Jul 21 14:43 ./
	drwxr-xr-x  18 root  wheel   512 Jul 20 18:46 ../
	drwxr-xr-x  24 jhs   staff  1024 Jul 21 15:32 head/
cd head
ls
	# COPYRIGHT etc
svn st
	# silent completion
svn up
	# silent completion
pwd
	/data/release/12.0-CURRENT/usr/src/head
cd ../.. ; mv src/head s ; rmdir src ; mv s src ; cd src
pwd
	/data/release/12.0-CURRENT/usr/src 
svn up
	Updating '.':
	At revision 303135.

OK, it wasn't an svn problem then, I was maybe missing meta data,
& have learnt status command available, & I should have tried harder ;-)
Thanks Ben ! Sorry for noise to others.

Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.eu/jhs/
 Mail plain text,  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
 Prefix old lines '> '  Reply below old, like play script.  Break lines by 80.
 http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes