Re: Bad rtwn(0) performance with RTL8188CE on -CURRENT after r302035

From: Otacílio <otacilio.neto_at_bsd.com.br>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 15:40:25 -0300
Em 27/06/2016 15:34, Marcus von Appen escreveu:
> On, Mon Jun 27, 2016, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Heh, there isn't any 11n support in rtwn (and won't be until I unify
>> rtwn and urtwn post-11.)
> I do not know about that. My experience from pre-r302035 were 1-2 Mbit/s
> downstream from some servers, but often enough just for a minute or two
> before everything stopped working.
>
>> I'll go find the rtwn NIC and see if I can figure out what's going on.
> Let me know, if and how I can assist with it.
>
> Cheers
> Marcus

About everything stopping I have faced a problem similar to this. Bellow 
is a log of a session where the problem occurs. I'm testing using netperf.

% netperf -H squitch
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to squitch ()
port 0
AF_INET : histogram : interval : dirty data : demo
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

   65536  32768  32768    14.03       0.02
shutdown_control: no response received  errno 28
% ping squitch
PING squitch (192.168.0.13): 56 data bytes
^C
--- squitch ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
% urtwn0: device timeout
urtwn0: device timeout
Received on Mon Jun 27 2016 - 16:40:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:06 UTC