On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, krad <kraduk_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Its also worth pointing that if you decouple the userland from the kernel > files you no longer have a boot environment, as all the basic stuff to boot > the os isn't contained within the bootfs. I'm still struggling to see why > /boot needs to be on a different dataset, its just a bit of a linuxism. > > On 10 March 2016 at 19:23, Trond Endrestøl > <Trond.Endrestol_at_fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:38+0300, Andrey Fesenko wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, krad <kraduk_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > > As Eric said you cant have /boot on a separate dataset as the whole >> > > loader >> > > bootstrap isnt designed too look for it on the dataset defined by >> > > bootfs. >> > > Remember no other datasets are mounted at that stage of the bootstrap. >> > > >> > > You could maybe bodge something by manually playing around with the >> > > bootfs >> > > property, symlinks and rootfs variables in the loader.conf. But why >> > > would >> > > you want to do this? It's more work and non standard, and will break a >> > > lot? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 10 March 2016 at 12:11, Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, krad <kraduk_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > presumably it boots now? >> > >> > >> > >> > On 10 March 2016 at 11:01, Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey_at_gmail.com> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:49 PM, krad <kraduk_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> > Make sure you are running the latest snapshot of current or 10.3 >> > >> >> > as >> > >> >> > well, as >> > >> >> > the MFC commits were in early February for 10-stable >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> If remove efiwpool/ROOT/init/boot and copy his content on >> > >> >> >> efiwpool/ROOT/init my scheme work fine too. >> > >> >> >> /usr /var /home and other included in BE for consistent boot >> > >> >> >> system >> > >> >> >> (CURRENT world may not boot with kernel other rev), and old >> > >> >> >> home >> > >> >> >> snapshot sometimes useful for backup/restore >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> >> >> > >> >> % uname -a >> > >> >> FreeBSD x220.efi.local 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 >> > >> >> r296548: >> > >> >> Wed Mar 9 01:16:17 MSK 2016 >> > >> >> root_at_des.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X220 amd64 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> My current working config >> > >> % mount >> > >> .... >> > >> >> > >> This work fine, booted, beadm create new env, activate them, see boot >> > >> menu and select BE. >> > >> >> > >> % beadm list >> > >> BE Active Mountpoint Space Created >> > >> init - - 420.7M 2016-03-09 02:57 >> > >> init0 NR / 35.9G 2016-03-10 05:00 >> > >> >> > >> If i'm add separate dataset for /boot (efiwpool/ROOT/init0/boot) >> > >> system not booted, efi loader (first stage) see only my pool, not >> > >> found /boot/loader.efi >> > > >> > > >> > >> > It probably does not matter, as bootfs have snapshots (BE), just >> > wanted to make it more clear (having taken significant mountpoint >> > /boot, /usr, /var... in zfs dataset) and was surprised why the system >> > does not boot >> > >> > It is clear that as long as the functionality is experimental and >> > under development, but would like to see where the full instructions >> > on its implementation / restrictions, at least as early as has been >> > described https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS >> >> If you keep /boot as a separate dataset/filesystem, with >> efiwpool/ROOT/init0/boot as the given bootfs, then boot1.efi will not >> see a /boot directory inside that dataset. The files and directories >> from /boot will be presented as living in /, the local root directory >> of that dataset. >> >> You could create a /boot/boot symlink pointing to . (dot), but it's >> better to let /boot be part of the regular boot environment, pretty >> similar to what you would find on a UFS system using a separate root >> filesystem. >> why? On the contrary, my scheme involves the entire system as a single BE (including home) > linuxism Is unlikely, to rather an attempt to use all the features ZFS. ZFS also many possible settings for each dataset/FS (compression, atime, exec......) Probably for /boot many of them unnecessary, but such separate extra snapshots, can would not be harmfulReceived on Fri Mar 11 2016 - 09:00:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC