Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 03/11/2016 14:31: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:10:56PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: [...] >>> Case of only a few monolitic packages is essentiality simple then case >>> of 1000 combined packages. >> pkg info -a on one diff with pkg info -a on the other >> for the full content: pkg info -a --raw on both end and diff them. >> >> That should cover your case, no? > > No, that may cause a much false positive: slight different versions, > unimportant packets and etc. In 1000 packets this give to many noise. If you don't need version numbers, you can list just package names pkg query %n or package origins pkg query %o Anything else is on your side and even if I understand your complaints (and I agree with some of them) I don't thing it will change anything on the future of packaged base. So it is better to spend our time on working local solution to new problem. It has some pros and some cons and I hope the pros will outweigh cons. Miroslav LachmanReceived on Fri Mar 11 2016 - 12:58:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC