On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 3/11/16 9:01 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:05:11PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:35:59PM +0000, David Chisnall wrote: >>>>> On 8 Mar 2016, at 15:14, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In terms of comparing packages, if you’re doing that visually then >>>>> you are likely to have problems anyway, unless your eyes and brain >>>>> work far better than most humans. We can make that much easier by >>>>> providing libxo output in pkg and allowing you to have a simple jq >>>>> script that tells you what the differences are. >>>>> >>>> pkg can already expose the entire content of a package in json or ucl >>>> via: >>>> $ pkg info --raw --raw-format [json|json-conpact|yaml|ucl] name >>> >>> Exposing the entire content of a package is not a root of cause. >>> Question in comapring of two different setup with different behaviour >>> and search cause of difference. >>> >>> Case of only a few monolitic packages is essentiality simple then case >>> of 1000 combined packages. >> >> It would be nice to have pkg(8) show packages in tree form, with option >> to show just top-level meta packages or packages that have no meta. >> >> Perhaps this is possible, but it's not obvious to me. >> > > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/master/scripts/pkg_tree.sh Cool, thanks. BTW, is there a typo on line 52? s/Pring/Print/? -- DEReceived on Sun Mar 13 2016 - 13:08:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC