On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:38:55PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 3/14/16 12:29 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd_at_quip.cz> writes: > >> Bryan Drewery <bdrewery_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > >>> https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/blob/master/scripts/pkg_tree.sh > >> Can you publish it as a port? I know there is one written in Perl but > >> I like your sh without dependencies. > > > > It's not very useful, in my opinion. The relationships between packages > > form a directed acyclic graph, not a tree, so pkg_tree.sh will either > > show too little (without -r) or far, far too much (with -r). If you > > want to visualize the package graph, you can feed the output of 'pkg > > query "%n %dn"' into something like graphviz. For other tasks, you are > > better off learning how to use 'pkg query' and possibly creating your > > own aliases or scripts. It's not that difficult; feel free to ask for > > help. > > > > (Just for kicks, I tried running 'pkg_tree.sh -rn' on my desktop, which > > has 934 packages installed. It's been running for ten minutes and has > > printed over 90,000 lines, with no end in sight.) > > > > Yeah that's why I never included it by default. It can be interesting > sometimes but often is too noisy. I didn't want to encourage its use by > default vs pkg info or pkg query. Also note that if people likes graph we can now generate graphviz output from the solver using pkg -o DOT_FILE="/something.dot" <upgrade|install|delete> then play with graphviz. Best regards, Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC