Hi Guido, maybe it's because of this: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=296963 Regards, --- José Pérez El 2016-03-18 17:33, Guido Falsi escribió: > Hi, > > I have just update one of my machines and noticed the booloaders files > got quite fat in the last few days, some by a big margin. > > on an updated machine(r296993): > >> ls -l /boot/*boot* > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot0 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot0sio > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72152 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot1.efi > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819200 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot1.efifat > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/boot2 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1185 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/cdboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 85794 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/gptboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 110546 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/gptzfsboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 358400 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/pxeboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 341248 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/userboot.so > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 66048 Mar 18 16:47 /boot/zfsboot > > from a machine I still have not updated(r296719): > >> ls -l /boot/*boot* > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot0 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot0sio > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot1 > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72152 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot1.efi > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 819200 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot1.efifat > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/boot2 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1185 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/cdboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 16059 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/gptboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 41511 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/gptzfsboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 288768 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/pxeboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 341208 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/userboot.so > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 66048 Mar 13 21:01 /boot/zfsboot > > I noticed because mu gpt boot partition is 64K and gptzfsboot just > passed 100K. > > Is this expected and I'm supposed to repartition or is this an unwanted > mistake? > > Thanks in advance.Received on Fri Mar 18 2016 - 15:56:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC