Re: FreeBSD MachO File format, your comments on it.

From: mokhi <mokhi64_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:35:38 +0430
Hi.

I'm agreed with point you told about improvements we can do for fat
format (or more).
And I'm ready to do them (with your helps, sure :D).

But we need short steps and more of them (a local proverb :D) IMO.
If we completely do this image activator, then we can have 2 sub plans
for OSX emulation and/or fat data segment redesign.

I saw netbsd's way of mach-kernel/darwin emulation.
They have been stopped in porting/simulating quartz (the reason
described lack of developers' interest IIRC), and that relates to OSX
emulating.
If we wanna complete/continue that way, first we need this image
activator, what's your opinion about it?

BTW, in brief I believe we can have strategies to do (sub plans) and
it worth (at least for me, because I'll learn good things). What's
your opinion?


Best wishes, Mokhi.
Received on Thu Mar 24 2016 - 11:05:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:03 UTC